As we get closer to the draft lottery, we’ve seen varying takes on who the Rangers will take depending on where they eventually wind up. While the specific players seem to be up for debate, the overall Rangers 2026 draft strategy is something most people agree on. The Rangers need high end talent. They need high end individual speed. They don’t need more players that may have intangibles but lack true high end talent and/or speed. To put it succinctly, the Rangers 2026 draft strategy should be driven by players like Carl Hagelin and Mika Zibanejad, not players like Sam Carrick and Brett Berard.
While that last sentence may come as a slight to both Carrick and Berard, it’s not. The Rangers have plenty of players like them. Adam Sykora, Jaro Chmelar, Tye Kartye, and others fill that tenacious forechecking, gritty, pain in the butt type player need. Every team needs them. But what these players can’t do is score 40-50 goals and 90+ points like Zibanejad. It’s just not what they are. They aren’t barn burners like Hagelin. This is what the Rangers need.
This is perhaps what has many irked about how high Keaton Verhoeff is going and how likely Chris Drury and team are to select him. Verhoeff is going to be a fine player, but he’s also not the highly skilled, top end speed defenseman the Rangers desperately need to take some strain off Adam Fox. If it’s a choice between Verhoeff and one of Chase Reid or Carson Carels, Verhoeff should be third on their list.
This should also apply to the second first round pick, should they use it. There are plenty of high ceiling centers available at that point in the draft, but using one on another player where skating is a concern would not diversify the farm system. Though a poor example because both prospects are projected to be top-ten picks, this may be why some prefer Tynan Lawrence over Caleb Malhotra.
The Rangers 2026 draft strategy should be focused on these high end skill and speed players because it’s what the farm system truly lacks. This may result in a Rangers 2026 draft strategy that is low floor, high ceiling instead of their usual high floor, low ceiling type approach. No disrespect to anyone outside of Gabe Perreault, but the Rangers don’t have those types of high ceiling, game breaking prospects. Their best prospects project to be middle of the lineup players. Again necessary and critical pieces of a well rounded team, but not the high ceiling, first line/pair prospects this team desperately needs.
To be fair, the Rangers have done well with their draft picks under the new scouting regime. They’ve gotten tremendous value out of mid and late round picks, and some of their higher ceiling prospects like Liam Greentree, Malcolm Spence, and EJ Emery are all developing properly. The problem again is none are projected to be barn burning skaters or game breaking scorers. The latter is far more difficult to find later in the draft, but remember barn burners like Hagelin–a 6th round pick–are found all over.
The Rangers 2026 draft strategy really needs to focus on balancing out the farm system. They have a lot of solid players with good work ethics and great intangibles. These are all critical pieces to round out the lineup. But outside of Gabe Perreault, there are no prospects projected to be first line or top pair players. The Rangers 2026 draft strategy needs to focus on these types of players, even if they come with low floors and high risk.
More About:Offseason
