Musings

Thoughts on the Chris Kreider injury

How it affects NYR's playoff push

The Rangers get a chance at revenge later today when they take on the Flyers at Madison Square Garden. Unfortunately they’ll do so without Chris Kreider, who suffered a fractured foot in Friday night’s 5-2 loss in Philadelphia. The Rangers are still in the thick of the playoff race, but will have to figure out how to clinch a wild card berth without the services of the speedy power forward, who has been playing at a point-per-game pace for the last two months. Naturally, I have some thoughts on this, as well as some other Rangers-related issues.

  • This may be a somewhat controversial take, but calling up Vitali Kravtsov is not the answer here. There are a few reasons I feel this way. After a whirlwind year for him, he’s just settling into a groove in Hartford. By all accounts, his performances have been solid and steadily improving, but he’s not exactly lighting the world on fire (1 goal, 5 assists in 11 games in February). Kravtsov’s style of play is also much different from Kreider’s, and I think the best route forward is to keep as much of the lineup intact as possible.
  • Keeping the lineup intact means not breaking up the “1B” line of Panarin-Strome-Fast, or taking Filip Chytil out of the middle and playing him on the wing (a short-term experiment that didn’t bear much fruit when Pavel Buchnevich missed two games earlier this week). Kaapo Kakko has played much better lately in a third line role alongside Chytil, and he’s more comfortable on the right wing (Kreider is a LW), so I wouldn’t move him either.
  • The two best candidates for Kreider’s spot then are Brendan Lemieux and Julien Gauthier. Lemieux is probably the Rangers’ second best net-front player after Kreider, while Gauthier has size and speed that approximate Kreider’s. If I were David Quinn, I’d give Gauthier the first crack with Zibanejad and Buchnevich.
  • Switching gears, how good is Adam Fox? His play deserves more praise than just one bullet point in a blog post, but I have to call it out. He reminds me so much of Brian Leetch. I realize that’s high praise, but the Rangers have not had a defenseman with the mix of offensive and defensive talent that Fox has since #2.
  • The rest of the defense lately has been… not great. This past week, the Rangers were on the wrong end of the shot attempt and scoring chance battle in all of their games. I know that doesn’t mean everything, especially this time of year when points are paramount, and the Rangers had a difficult week between the trade deadline, car accident, and lots of travel. That said, their much-improved process is the reason the Rangers are in this race. Yes, the goaltending has been good, but it hasn’t had to steal points every single night. Let’s hope this is just a blip in the radar and not a regression to the historically bad ways of October and November.
  • Artemi Panarin for Hart, playoffs or not. It defies all logic that he’s considered outside the current top 4 of McDavid, Draisaitl, Pastrnak and McKinnon. Look at Panarin’s linemates! That’s no slight to Ryan Strome (who I think has been much better than most will give him credit for) or Jesper Fast, but come on.
  • Have you subscribed to the podcast yet? Becky, Dave and I are having a blast recording it, and we’re pretty proud of how it’s come out so far. Get it on iTunes, Spotify, Soundcloud and Google Play; if you’re listening on iTunes, please leave a rating and review. We’d also love to hear feedback in the comments here, and on Twitter.

Show More
  • Freak play, bad luck, nothing else to say on CK’s injury.

    Gaut should be the guy to replace CK. Lemieux does not possess the skills to be playing with Zib and Buch. I think Gaut deserves a shot here.

    Krav probably will not be called up this year. Probably rightfully so, given his mish mosh of a season this year.

  • The difference between a playoff team and a non playoff team is depth. The rash of Rangers injuries will determine if they have enough talent in the pipeline to successfully fill in the roster vacancies.

  • Can we please stop with the Leetch/Fox comparisons!
    While Fox has been great as far as vision and passing, he is no where near Number two’s skating ability. And that is a huge separation.

    Also, Lindgren’s play has been much much more steady than anyone could have anticipated

  • Excellent post, Rob. Great prescription going forward – try Gauthier first, then Lemieux.

    As for the Hart Trophy, it is for the MVP and it is just reasonable to say that players on non-playoff teams lack great value by definition. Panarin may very well be the best player in the NHL, but I can’t see him in the Hart Trophy conversation if the Rangers don’t make the playoffs (and we know, whether I am right or wrong, the voters agree with me).

    • Actually by definition it means the ONE player with the most value to his team, so there’s no reason why making the playoffs should be a criterion. The issue might better be proposed as what is the overall impact of the player on winning games. So the question here is what would the Ranger record be without Panarin … and for the Oilers what would it be without McDavid or without Draisatl, etc.

  • Back to top button
    >