Players

2019 Rangers Player Report Card: Ryan Strome

Ryan Spooner to Edmonton for Ryan Strome, even with salary retained, was one of Jeff Gorton’s best trades of the season. The Rangers sent Spooner, who was less than a spare part, to the Oilers for a 25 year old former top-five pick who needed a change of scenery. At the very worst, it was a wash for both teams. But this wasn’t the very worst. This was a trade that worked out in spades.

For all his struggles in Edmonton, Strome really clicked offensively in New York. His line of 18-15-33 in 63 games with the Blueshirts (1-1-2 in 18 with Edmonton) helped him set a career high in goals and left him one shy of 20 for the season. The issue is determining whether or not Strome’s production was smoke and mirrors – I had an entire post on this that was wiped away in the hacking, but he was shooting 22.5% with the Rangers, which isn’t sustainable – since he doesn’t have the underlying numbers to support that he can continue this next year.

Now of course we’ve been wrong before, with Micharl Grabner being the outlier here, but Strome’s xGF% of 43.75 was good for 5th worst on the team. With someone like Strome and that production, you would expect that to be broken down to favor offensive aptitude but lean towards extreme negatives defensively. Unfortunately only the latter is true, as Strome’s xGA/60 was 2.93, good for 4th worst on the team. His xGF/60, which is what I’m really leaning on here to see if he can reproduce that almost 20-goal season was 2.28, again 5th worst on the team. With Strome, the numbers show us that he was likely smoke and mirrors.

Let’s move to shot heatmaps to further hammer this point home. First let’s see how the Rangers do offensively with Strome on the ice:

Clearly not that good. Clearly the -8% threat level is something to take note of, but all that blue is just bad. And driving the point home, let’s look at it when he’s not on the ice:

While not exactly great, the threat level gains 8% back to average and there is more red in front of the net. Since Strome has been used primarily as a center lately, that’s his area. Not a good look.

Defensively the entire team was a relative tire fire, but Strome didn’t exactly do much to limit the damage against weak competition. Here’s how the Rangers did with Strome:

The threat level of 24% above average is downright awful and there is so much red in the home plate area. It’s really bad. And the Rangers are better when he’s not on the ice.

And as expected, the Rangers do much better defensively when Strome isn’t on the ice.

What we have here is a potential smoke and mirrors case with Strome. His 22.5% shooting rate is likely not able to be reproduced, because aside from the fact that it is double his career SH% of 10%, no one in the league shoots at 20% on a regular basis. Even Alex Ovechkin only scores at a 12.6% clip. The greatest goal scorer of our generation, 12.6% shooting rate for his career and never a year that is close to 22.5%. To think he can continue this for a prolonged period of time is dangerous thinking and will lead to disappointment.

If Strome shot at his career average, he would have finished this season with a line of 9-13-22 during his stint with the Rangers and there would be no doubt that the Rangers, while still finding something useful for Spooner, should not be looking to keep Strome beyond this year. His underlying numbers do not bode well even on a bad team. But still, he almost scored 20 goals, and when evaluating for a full season’s worth of work, you can’t ignore it.

Grade: B.

"2019 Rangers Player Report Card: Ryan Strome", 3 out of 5 based on 5 ratings.
Tags
Show More

7 Comments

  1. I think B+ David, only because he totally outperformed expectations. I get the extremely high shooting % and I agree, but he did pot the goals, and that’s all that matters.

    Now, is this a guy that gets a 3/4 year extension? No way, because of the suspect shooting % he enjoyed during this past year. Though I do believe that he did other things well. If he were the 3rd C here making around $3M per, no one would complain.

  2. Ryan has been found to be a nice addition to the team. I like his versatility, and is a solid bottom six player that can be moved up, and down the line up. If he were signed for a reasonable contract, like what Tony stated above, he can take some of the pressure off of the kids as they develop.

  3. Nice addition. Needs to resign at fair price. Just one of many middle 6 guys we have. It would be great if we were deep enough to have him center the 4th line. Can’t overpay based on his small sample from last year.

    Anyone see the article where they have Panarin going to Florida to be back with Quenville? Between Coach Quenville and the Florida state tax (none), might be hard to bring him to NY.

    1. saw that story too Sal, but if you’re in the “we want Panarin” camp remember JD was President of Columbus when they traded for him from Chicago. So does President trump Coach? who knows. The taxes ain’t going to help NY.

    1. You have to want to be a Ranger, if you really don’t then you should never be a Ranger … and a great accountant/tax attorney of which there are plenty in NYC can always minimize the tax differences somewhat. Then factor in the exposure the City gives you. We should never have to outbid/overpay a player to play here.

  4. If Gorton really knows his stuff he won’t look at this trade as his personal coup but rather as an opportunity to turn Strome’s perceived value into another (better) asset. Of course, if he’s delusional on Strome’s value and only evaluates without using the obvious negative metrics then he’ll give him an extension. However, I’m starting to get more confidence in JG, I think he is aware.

Back to top button
Close
Close