State of the Rangers

Eminger Over Gilroy?

It should be pointed out at this stage that this is not an anti Matt Gilroy crusade; in fact it’s far from it. He just doesn’t seem to fit in this Rangers team, or at least don’t seem to be able to play his natural game effectively for the Rangers. What this post is about is discussing what may become a straight up choice between two players over the summer; when the Rangers look at putting together next season’s team. The decision between the two defensemen – Gilroy or Eminger – may just come down to economics and if it does, then the choice is even simpler. When the Rangers decide who to bring back for next season they should look to Steve Eminger and not Matt Gilroy. Gilroy has a lot of talent, he is a great skater and has offensive ability but it would be a surprise if he was willing to accept significantly less salary than he earns right now and the problem is, he is only worth significantly less, at least to this team.

The Rangers clearly still plan (as they should) with Michael Del Zotto and Bryan McCabe has done enough thus far to suggest he’s worth bringing back at the right price – ahead of Gilroy and in addition to Eminger. Those two fill the need for offensive defensemen next year, just fine. McCabe has produced more offensively than Gilroy, has that cannon of a shot, is more physical and is that veteran presence this team needs at the back. That brings us to Steve Eminger. He may be the perfect low maintenance depth defenseman. He costs little (even factoring in a little rise), plays physical and has recently stepped in admirably for Marc Staal proving he can handle a bigger work load. Yes, Eminger has had his moments where he’s caught out of position or where he has made a mistake or two but as your 6th or 7th defensemen the Rangers could do a lot worse and this is the point. Whether it is Eminger or Gilroy; at this stage one of those two looks to be the extra defenseman next year. So why have a cap burden (Gilroy) in the press box?

Gilroy will find a team next year if he isn’t kept by the Rangers. He could still turn out to be a good offensive defenseman in the league (a team like Columbus seems an ideal situation for the former Hobey Baker winner) but he doesn’t fit on the Rangers now, or next season. Eminger ticks too many boxes not to keep him around for another year. Cheap, low maintenance, good depth: underrated things that every good team needs to have. For the Rangers, those things mean Steve Eminger.


Show More
  • Since we will have an issue with replacing vets with NHL experience with our forwards.

    We should really try converting gillie to a forward

    He was a fwd before bc. And took that role because of injuries.

    He’s fast , can puck handle and hold the puck. Has a good wrister and can crash the net. Plus he’s already familiar with the system

    Who would rather choose between for the scratch

    Wolski, zuc, ghillie, or Avery.

  • I think your points are well made but I would take Gilroy over Eminger. I’ll admit though that Eminger is a better defencemen right now and better suited as a 7th man. Gilroy has a GVT nearly 6x that of Eminger (2.9 vs 0.5) although Eminger’s Qualcomp and Corsi scores are roughly double Gilroy’s. McCabe isn’t a terrible option but his salary will be expensive and he will block MDZ from making the squad next year.

    The main difference between Eminger and Gilroy is potential. Gilroy is an offensive defencemen with a R-handed shot, and although we haven’t seen it with any consistency, he still has a fair amount of upside. Yes, potential is just a word but why not take a chance on a guy who may have the ability to become a solid offensive d-man over the dime-a-dozen guys like Eminger. I don’t think Gilroy’s contract demands will be outrageous and if he fails to improve substantially the Rangers can simply trade or demote him.

  • one could argue that if given more PP time, Gilroy would produce more

    isn’t this one of the reasons he’s on the team, offensive? get him out there on the PP already

  • Back to top button