Playing the puck a necessary evil for goaltenders

May 4, 2012, by

The risk/reward dynamic of when a goalie plays the puck is not usually hotly debated by fans.  It is only when the playoffs roll around that fans, writers, analysts and the like all start to put these types of plays under a microscope.  They tend to have a polarizing effect and when I was asked by a buddy of mine whether Hank should ever leave the net ever again, I realized a primer was necessary on how and why playing the puck from a goalie’s perspective is a necessary evil.

Let’s get one thing out of the way first. Hank is not particularly adept at playing the puck.  We all know this.  However, Hank is generally very functional back there.  He’s not going to ever act as a third defenseman like Marty is so famous for, but he generally does not hurt the bottom line with his puck playing.  Let’s go through the three main functions that the goaltender playing the puck can accomplish, and we will see if folks still want Hank glued to his crease…

Breakout:  When a puck is dumped in by a forechecking winger, the goaltender playing the puck does not allow the forechecker to isolate one of the defensemen.  Each can play out and receive the pass from the tender, they can criss-cross behind the net and begin the breakout, or one can run a variation of a pick on the forechecker to allow space for first pass out of the zone.

The play looks incredibly innocuous when we watch from afar because the value is only seen if the goalie does not play the puck.  If the tender lets the puck go, it forces the d-man to chase it, usually into the far part of the corner, which takes the clean passing lane to the other d-man away.  It also can force the winger, who would normally be drifting high to accept a breakout pass, to drop down low to support the play.  It’s a quick recipe for getting pinned in your own zone by the opposing forecheck.  Especially if they are dropping two into the zone.

Stymieing the forecheck: Getting the puck deep is a timeless objective in our great game.  It allows for a safe change and for teams not to get caught in transition if they turn the puck over.  It is also the cornerstone for aggressive forechecking teams like the Rangers.  If you can get the puck into an area where the defensemen must take a long route to the puck, your forechecking wingers can force them into battles for the puck, create a cycle and press for giveaways that can lead to quality offensive chances.

If the goalie swings around on dump-ins to stop the puck, it gives the d-man a direct path to the puck with space and options upon possession. This way the d-man does not have to chase the puck into the corner.  It also gives the defensemen more time to make a decision with the puck because they aren’t spending their time in pursuit, often with only one viable option.  This benefit the goalie provides is seldom seen directly, but evidenced every time you see a team dump the puck in hard to keep the goalie from stopping it on them.

In transition:  This is an instance where more adept puck handling goalies can excel.  Marty Brodeur, Mike Smith and their ilk can take advantage of teams changing, catching wingers down low and on the power play by utilizing their puck moving skills to stretch the rink out north/south.  The trapezoid has severely hampered the goalie’s ability to do this, however, most of the better ones now just make sure to get to the puck before it crosses the goal line.

If your goalie can take advantage of this type of situation, it becomes something the opposing coach must plan for.  Penalty killers against NJ’s power play knows that if they want to make a clean change, they have to get the puck around Marty, or he will spring a winger up ice and put pressure on the changing team.

The benefits of a quality puck playing goaltender are seldom seen, but can change the landscape of a game.  For those who aren’t as gifted, their contributions on the breakout and against the opposition’s forecheck cannot be understated.  While I know that playing the puck is not Hank’s forte, he is usually pretty competent at the basic functions which are very necessary to the overall system that the club plays.  If we think they spend too much time pinned in their own zone now, imagine if Hank never left his crease again…

Categories : Analysis, Goaltending


  1. The Suit says:

    Great analysis. Hopefully this enlightens some of his critics..

    • VinceR says:

      I agree on the analysis. I was one of the people who in previous post were commenting he should never play the puck, but I think most of us meant that tongue in cheek and were just picking on him for some of his, err…adventures outside the cage.

  2. Dave says:

    It’s never as simple as “don’t play the puck ever again.” Wish Hank would improve upon this skill though.

  3. Chris F says:

    As someone who’s taken some shots at Hank’s puck handling decisions, I feel compelled to note that the underlying issue I have, and many others have, is not that Lundqvist handles the puck -we know that’s necessary at times- it’s how he handles the puck.

    He frequently cycles the puck up the boards into oncoming forwards. He must get better at his decision making.

  4. Justin says:

    Chris and Vince…I think most people know that Hank literally never coming out of the crease is not a practicable solution, however, I wanted to shed some light on the functional purpose that playing the puck serves. I have heard a lot of reactionary talk that maybe exposing this weakness in his game should be minimized to the fullest extent possible, without really understanding how important it is.

    Especially since you guys aren’t the reactionary types, it’s not too difficult for you to understand, there are many twitterings and such that claim every time he touches the puck outside of making a save it’s a liability…

    • VinceR says:


      But seriously, I do get the reason for the post and highly appreciate it. I always like the more in depth stuff. Like I understood that most of the time, playing the puck is to disrupt the attackers’ strategy, but the post helped me to appreciate more the split second decisions/strategy that needs to be made on exactly how and why it is going to be played.

      Also when Hank was on the Bryant Gumbel HBO show (Inside Sports?, can’t remember the name) I do like how he did go into puck handling as the weak part of his game (I believe the exact quote was “I suck” – a little bit of a harsh self assessment) and how he plans to concentrate on that aspect of his game next. And knowing his intensity and dedication, I’m looking forward to seeing that next season.

      Always appreciate the in depth strategy discussions, keep up the good work! (all of you)