NHL Expansion confirmed for Las Vegas, expansion draft rules finalized

The worst kept secret has been confirmed, as the NHL will expand to 31 teams in the 2017-2018 season. Las Vegas is the destination, as has been rumored/basically confirmed for the past few months. The team will play in the Pacific Division. The team paid a record $500 million in expansion fees to the 30 NHL owners, none of which needs to be shared with the players.

More importantly, the expansion draft rules have been finalized. The major points we know: The Rangers can protect 7 forwards, 3 defensemen, and 1 goalie, or 8 skaters and 1 goalie. They can only lose one player to the draft as well. As rumored, any player with a no-move clause must be protected and counts towards the protection list. Dan Girardi, Marc Staal, and Henrik Lundqvist are the players with no-moves. First and second year pros (Brady Skjei, Pavel Buchnevich) are exempt, as are unsigned draft picks.

NHL expansion to Quebec City has been deferred as the city works things out.

"NHL Expansion confirmed for Las Vegas, expansion draft rules finalized", 5 out of 5 based on 1 ratings.

19 thoughts on “NHL Expansion confirmed for Las Vegas, expansion draft rules finalized

  • Jun 22, 2016 at 7:27 pm

    Who would the rangers protect if the draft was this summer?
    G. Lundqvist
    D. Girardi (ouch), Staal (ouch), McDonagh
    F. Stepan, Brassard, Zuc, Kreider, Miller, Fast. Would Nash or Lindberg be unprotected?
    We would for sure lose Klein in this scenario.

    • Jun 22, 2016 at 7:37 pm

      You think Klein would get picked over Nash in your scenario? Or any of the other forwards, such as Hayes? We can only lose at most one player.

      • Jun 22, 2016 at 7:44 pm

        They would only pick Nash if they need to get to 60% cap floor. Klein at 2.75mil is a better bargain than Nash at 8mil.
        If the hypothetical expansion team picks Hayes over Klein, I’d only thank them.

        • Jun 23, 2016 at 10:24 am

          Hayes vs Klein may depend on their goal in their early years as well as what other players are available to them. Klein will turn 32 in December, so they would be selecting a player on the downside of his career. Hayes isn’t turning 25 until May and is improving (despite a bit of a sophomore jinx). Hayes will be in his prime in two or three years while Klein might be winding down his career.

  • Jun 22, 2016 at 8:06 pm

    Here we go again, now that the rules are finalized, Sather gave it to us again, on his way out the door. We have to protect both of the pylons, so this makes it imperative that we move at least one this week end, before the draft. I just hope that Gorton learns from this experience that under no circumstance do we sign long term deals to old farts, and grant them NMC, what bull this is……….

  • Jun 22, 2016 at 8:47 pm

    lazy questions:

    #1 so you don’t have to protect those with no-trade clause?

    #2 what if NMC turns into NTC for the 2017 season?

    • Jun 23, 2016 at 10:33 am

      1 – You don’t.
      2 – Depends on the clause. Girardi’s still has a NMC (no waivers). So he needs to be protected.

      • Jun 23, 2016 at 12:14 pm

        States have No move clauses at the time of the expansion draft.

        If draft is completed after 7/1 (isn’t that date next years deals kick in?) wouldn’t Girardi now be on a No trade clause?

        Did they announce a draft date yet or is it known it will be prior to 7/1?

  • Jun 23, 2016 at 12:02 am

    Girardi’s NMC converts to a NTC for 17-18, so does not need to be protected.

    • Jun 23, 2016 at 12:58 am

      There seems to be a difference of opinion on that

      • Jun 23, 2016 at 4:22 am

        This isn’t a matter of opinion, this is a matter of fact.

        * All players who have currently effective and continuing “No Movement” clauses at the time of the Expansion Draft (and who to decline to waive such clauses) must be protected (and will be counted toward their club’s applicable protection limits).

        Bill Daly confirmed via Greg Wyshinski that if a NMC converts to a NTC in 2017-18 year, does not need to be protected.

        • Jun 23, 2016 at 8:00 am

          Good info..

        • Jun 23, 2016 at 1:03 pm

          Well it says at the time of the expansion draft which is before the real draft and July 1. So it’s possible that year of the girardi contract hasn’t started yet

        • Jun 23, 2016 at 5:22 pm

          Do you really think LV will pick G off our list of available players think not . Only way G and Staal leave is by trade or Bye Out

  • Jun 23, 2016 at 12:26 am

    Seattle should be next expansion site.

  • Jun 23, 2016 at 4:45 am

    Man, there’s a whole host of moving parts to this thing. The floor for Vegas to hit is $43.8mm and they have 3 days to shake down clubs to maximize the value of who they pick (or don’t pick.) At this time, the team should be able to get future draft picks for selecting the “right” player to get to the floor. Lots of extra 2nd & 3rd rd pick to accumulate for years 1-3.

    At 1st glance Vegas should be able to get good goaltending and a solid, if unspectacular D corps. If anything, they might be able to stock up on D and deal them for picks or prospects after the draft concludes. The key is to select guys with staggered expiring contracts.

    The forward situation is a little different. The only top 6 guys to get are ones with massive contracts that they’re not playing up to and bottom 6 types. Maybe they get lucky and someone like Hayes or Zuccarello is exposed.

    But if done right, Vegas should have $30mm in cap space in year 1 and can keep the decks clear for another 3 years going forward. They max out Victor Hedman in year 1 and go from there. At the same time they have extra picks to build up the prospect pool in a hurry so they compete both in the short term and long run.

  • Jun 23, 2016 at 7:22 am

    las vegas should be great now they need good guys to help them win games which I think they will get

  • Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 am

    The Panthers signed Yandle to a 7 year contract, at $6.35 mil per year. That’s fine, and good for him, but Florida will live to regret it because he gets a 6 year no move clause, and in year 7, it becomes a modified no move clause. Now how stupid is that contract ? Dale Tallon should be fired for the agreement, not so much for the money, but the terms………….These idiots will never learn !!!!!!!

    • Jun 23, 2016 at 7:56 am

      Dale Tallon doesn’t do that anymore. New GM is a propellerhead, must be trying to define a new metric on how to set other people’s money on fire with optimal efficiency.

Comments are closed.