Searching free agency for a speed upgrade for the Rangers

In a utopian hockey world, the Rangers’ roster would be full of 6-foot-6 tanks that all skated like the wind, possessed unreal skills, and paid equal attention to both ends of the ice.
But in reality, NHL teams can really only afford to focus on a couple of attributes in building their rosters. The best franchises have identified those characteristics within their existing talent pool and continued to add and improve over the years. The Kings, Ducks and Panthers are teams of physical giants that will grind you into a pulp, while the Lightning, Penguins and Stars have focused on speed and skill.
The 2015-2016 Rangers lost their identity. They maintained the same all-world goalie that was key to the John Tortorella-era Blueshirts who were airtight defensively, and the recent Alain Vigneault edition that became a lightning quick counterattack team. But this year’s group never quite figured out what it was beyond having that super-safety net in goal.
I wrote last week about how losing Carl Hagelin and Martin St. Louis stripped New York of its top speed down the wings, which left this squad incomplete. But many of the pieces to that speedy transition team are still in place and if you’re in favor of a retool as I am, this is the easiest path to rectifying the ailing roster on a budget.
Why? Well, the secret of speed up front is that it masks inept puck moving from the blueliners. Think about it – prior to Yandle, who have the Rangers had in recent history that you would consider even an adequate puck mover from the back-end? It’s not like Girardi and Staal just started struggling in that area this season. Ryan McDonagh and Anton Stralman are exceptions, but the laundry list of failed experiments includes Dan Boyle, Matt Gilroy, Michael Del Zotto, Roman Hamrlik, and so on.
But despite that lack of strong outlet passers, the Rangers managed to evolve into a lethal speed team. That’s because they were so loaded with wheels up front that those defensemen didn’t have to put pinpoint passes on the fowards’ sticks. Having speed allows players to dump and chase effectively – just slug it into the attack zone and let the horses gallop after it. Speed also allows the forwards to get the puck and go, carrying it out of their own end more easily. And there are other nifty ways to exit as we’ve seen time and again with the patented Hagelin alley-oop into the far corner down the rink.
Without the top speed New York has had in the past, the defense’s struggles to complete outlet passes accurately was exposed time and again. And whether the Rangers manage to keep Keith Yandle or not, they aren’t likely to be able to fix the blueline in one fell swoop this offseason – so keying in on speed is potentially a more viable alternative.
For recent evidence of how speed can transform a team, just look at Pittsburgh. Outside of Kris Letang, the Penguins are not rife with puck-movers. Derrick Pouliot may get there some day, but Pittsburgh was basically a one-man show out of its own end until the addition of Trevor Daley. He made an enormous difference, especially in conjunction with the slew of swift forwards that suddenly became mainstays in the Penguins’ lineup.
And that’s the key thing the Rangers hopefully observed from Pittsburgh – speed isn’t always expensive. Sure, Hagelin makes $4 million – but Bryan Rust and Conor Sheary were six-figure call-ups from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.
So how can the Rangers emulate the Penguins?
Well, New York is poised to take its first step in the right direction in the coming days when the Blueshirts sign Russian prospect Pavel Buchnevich to his Entry-Level contract.
Next, my preference is for the team to clear cap space and obtain maximum return while moving on from Dan Girardi, Marc Staal and Rick Nash. The target in a Nash trade should be a rising blueliner – supplemented by a young, cheap forward with speed. Moving those contracts would also enable the Blueshirts to to re-sign Yandle and make additional personnel changes.
There are some intriguing options available via free agency. Red Wings dynamo Darren Helm headlines the list and could be a very tempting quick-fix, but the price tag may be prohibitive. The same goes for Mikkel Boedker, Frans Nielsen and Jason Chimera, but there are cheaper options like Michael Grabner available, too. (Even if the Rangers don’t clear enough cap space to do any real tinkering, they should be handing out PTOs to one-dimensional speedsters in September like candy).
Right now, the Blueshirts are somewhere in limbo – too good to rebuild and not good enough to contend. But the front office should recognize the team’s strengths and the realities of the marketplace and retool around speed.
Kevin
What you failed to mention is that we have Stalberg, who is big, strong, fast, skilled, and can be had for a reasonable amount. While you propose we look at a guy like Helm, I say, look within, and resign Vic… It’s the cheapest way to go, he knows the system, and has been effective for us, in spite of AV playing him up, and down the line up, with all different players from shift, to shift !!!!!!
As for trading the players mentioned, I’m all for it. Unlike some on this site, Nash may well be the two way player that he is, but for the money, I want better results from him. It would be interesting to see how many of his goals over the last three season’s were empty net goals? That would inflate his numbers, which are misleading some……As for Dan, well I won’t bore you again with my opinion, and or feelings !!!
To the issue of UFA, I would avoid them if at all possible, with age being my main concern. We have the golden opportunity to retool the right way, no more old farts !!!!!!!!!
Under the scenario of getting rid of all 3, keeping Stalberg would be very doable and wise. But will need to add much more than that – as we saw, VS wasn’t enough
Obviously we need more than I wrote, but the point I was trying to make is don’t look at the other guys lawn, the grass always looks greener than yours. We have some home grown people to consider before we go nuts again with FA signings, that keep us in that damn cap hell hole !!!!!!!!!!!
Great points Walt and agree on keeping Stalberg. To be fair on empty netters though, as easy as they seem, how many times did we need one and we could not get it last year? As evidenced by the number of games we blew in the last minute then lost in OT. The point is fair on Nash, but The Rangers sure make it seem very hard to get an empty netter last year.
fair enough, and good point, but Nash’s empty netters make his numbers look even better than they are !!!!!!
I definitely want to see Stalberg back…and I definitely want to see him not on the fourth line. I just feel his speed was wasted there most of the time. Now, if they could also manage to find someone else – lots of speed and just enough skill to be worth a couple million, AKA another Stalberg – to put on the other side of him, and have Hayes (who may not be a speed demon but also is faster than a lot of people seem to think) center that line… Well, they probably won’t win a lot of faceoffs, haha. But that would be a fast and fluid line I think.
you should not only look for speed but someone with grit and skill the grit came from cally and skill is what we need more of
Issue is finding all of those traits in one gets veryyyy expensive
Your trade proposal sucks. At best the Rangers might be able to accomplish one of those goals (maximum return, clear cap space). If you want maximum return you typically have to retain some salary. If you want maximum cap space cleared you have to accept a lesser return in players. That’s the way pro sports trades typically work. You seem to think that other teams will be willing to take on your declining players with toxic contracts (and assume all the payments) while returning valuable, young, cost-controlled players.
And I am in the let Yandle walk camp. Don’t misunderstand – I like a lot of what Yandle does but I’m not handing an expensive, long-term deal to a guy turning 30 who is good but not great. That’s what the Rangers need to get away from.
well said !!!!!!!
Just curious – who do you consider to be a great defenseman? Who do you put Yandle in the same category as?
I follow the Rangers – not the whole league (don’t have time for that) so I can’t really give you a detailed comparison to many other players. I don’t think he’s as good as Letang for one. I’m not sure how Yandle stacks up against guys like Burns (SJ), Weber (NSH) because I rarely see those guys and I don’t really know their stats.
I guess Karlson (spelling?) on OTT is a guy I would compare Yandle to (good offensive player, not much of a defender) but I don’t know his age or stats well enough to say.
Who’s a “great” defenseman? Brian Leetch, Larry Robinson (obviously two very different players) – guys like that. I don’t see Yandle in the HOF class and I cringe at the Leetch comparisons guys like to throw around WRT Yandle.
Look, I like Yandle. Without the salary cap or if he was younger I’d keep him. I just don’t see him as a sign at any cost guy because of his age, his shortcomings as a defender and in managing the puck (turnovers, high-risk passes) and his pass-first style of play (Rangers need a guy with a big shot from the point more than a play maker – have too many of those as it is).
You’re free to disagree but I think avoiding expensive, long-term commitments to players on the wrong side of the age curve is more important to the Rangers than what Yandle brings to the table. The argument for keeping him is not unreasonable – I simply come down on the other side of it.
There is almost no one in Yandle’s category. One might compare him to Michael Del Zotto, good puck mover but weak in his own end. However, he’s obviously much better offensively and weaker defensively than MDZ.
He is a difficult player to evaluate and it is easy to get distracted. How good is he as a puck mover and offensive force? HOF caliber maybe. How good is he in his own end with the nuts and bolts of defense? Far from NHL caliber. AV actually used Chris Summers on the PK this year, but not Yandle.
Note: As Yandle has taken on a bigger role, the Rangers have not gotten better.
Ray, I have to disagree on a lot of your points.
MDZ is a pale imitation of Yandle, and I find Yandle to be much better defensively than Del Zotto, and much better than most people give him credit for.
When McD went down with injuries, and AV was forced to use Yandle more, the team got a lot better. He seems to play stronger with more minutes, more responsibility; and when he was finally used on PP over Boyle, their performance improved.
As for AV’s use of Yandle, that hardly is an indication of his value. If that was the case, than the measuring stick for NHL quality players is the HOF bound Tanner Glass. And that is a very very very tall bar
@roadrider – Move on from does not necessarily mean trade. G may need a buyout…
Buyouts, as I understand them, have salary cap hits that go on for years. If you’re talking about buyouts for Girardi and Staal then the only return you’re going to get is for Nash and its not likely to be as much as you’re hoping for because the same dynamic will be in play – Rangers retaining salary for a better return in players or accepting lesser players in return for more salary relief.
Either way I find your proposal somewhat unrealistic.
They do have cap hits, but it still saves a ton of dough short term. See here
https://blueseatblogs.com/2016/05/07/rangers-need-explore-buying-dan-girardi-marc-staal/
As I wrote, the real return comes from Nash, and the cap savings from moving the other two allows flexibility to bring in other pieces
Wouldn’t it be amazing if buy outs also meant a financial penalty for the GM’s who signed those contracts?
I’d imagine Sather would have been much less generous had that been the case.
I have wish lists too, but they are baked with a dose of reality. Only Nash can be moved, and at his salary, and his somewhat lack-luster level of play, the return will not be supreme. A team makeover, sure, but it will not be a tinkering and back to the finals. We have to bite the bullet my friend. Girardi ard Staal will be here for years to come, so get with the sad-but-true program. Let’s figure out a way to run them out there as the 5th, 6th or 7th defenseman and move on.
Use the Nash chip to bring back some youth and speed and cap space. Yandle won’t be back. Let’s hope Skjei is the real deal and Matt Gilroy can play. Make Hayes our 4th line center with Hriivek and Fast so Stallberg’s speed can be utilized properly on the line with Zucc and Brass. Let Stepan, Kreider and Buch try their chemisty for a while while JT moves to the 3rd line with some more hungry kids. I do not see 90 points in their near future.
Is Matt Gilroy coming back from Russia????????—’cause thats where he’s been.
I meant to say a guy like Matt Gilroy can be had.
Of course Gilroy can be had, he’s terrible.
The Rangers already gave Gilroy two chances. As much as I wanted things to work for the guy, he was worse the second time around. He’s just not good enough to play in The Show.
Sal, Girardi is gone after next season. He has only one full year of a No Movement Clause left on his contract, after that he has to give the Rangers a list of 15 teams he doesn’t want to go to every summer. The remaining teams, are potential trade partners.
Staal is in a similar situation, but his NMC is good through 2017-2018.
Just because he CAN be traded doesn’t mean there will be anyone who WANTS him.
Some team is always willing to take a veteran on.
For all we know, G could still be very effective on a bad team that isn’t looking to push the pace (i.e. a team that just wants to block shots). Also, his character is of the highest quality.
I do think Girardi (and Staal, for that matter) would not look nearly this bad in some of the defenses throughout the league. It’s just AVs insistence on man D and overload…just no bueno for most defenders who have as many miles on them as him. AV is asking a prototypical stay at home zone-style shot-blocking defenseman to do none of those things…and several things that are just not in his tool kit. I’m honestly surprised Girardi looked as decent as he did in his first AV season. 100% a square peg, round hole scenario with him fitting AVs D philosophy. While I do not pine for Torts or anything like that, just to note, I don’t think Girardi would look quite so bad if he was still in that system.
So, while I’m not exactly optimistic of a deal coming together, and I don’t think we get away with it without retaining significant (if not quite to buyout level salary) salary…there is at least a possibility, I think. Chris has a point.
Let’s trade Nash to Arizona for Dylan Strome.
ARI has roughly $11M coming off their books b/t Doan, Tanguay, & Gordon and they could take on Nash’s $7.8M hit. For example, they are carrying Pronger just to reach the cap floor.
They are a team that would entertain taking on more salary then what they are giving up. Plus, I want something back for the Duclair trade.
Throw in a mix of Staal/Girardi and Kreider/Hayes to deal for a guy like Connor Murphy too. Again, same concept, they would accept more salary just to reach the floor.
One obstacle would be getting Arizona’s new 26 year old GM to take on either Girardi or Staal’s contracts. Their GM John Chayka is very stats oriented… prior to working with the Coyotes he founded the analytics company Stathletes.
I’d say that might be one of the least likely areas the Rangers would be able to send Girardi or Staal.
Aside from that, there’s no way they would swap Nash for Strome given the current incompleteness of their roster. They’re going to look to build around and add to a young core. Not trade it off for an aging Rick Nash.
Yeah, I agree but you see where I’m going with this. There should be some viable options out there and a way to accomplish a trade or two.
Helm’s getting his payday, but would be a solid addition. Given his time on Datsyuk’s wing, we all know he can face top competition.
Another guy who will be expensive but would be a nice fit with this group- Versteeg. Coming off a 4 yr 4.4per contract.
A lesser depth option- Riley Nash out of CAR.
Those 3 make my list of under 30 UFA forwards who I’d kick the tires on
Don’t really get this fascination with Versteeg. Not interested at all. I loved Helm as a Jr. but you’d have to move a few guys to afford him.
Fascination is a bit of an exaggeration. In any case, I’ll expand…
Offensively gifted, righty shot, plays RW- so he fits the from a depth chart perspective. RW is our biggest fwd hole. Behind Zucarello, we’ve got ______. Which is in part why Fast was a staple on our second line for most of the year. Versteeg would fix that.
LA used him to run their PP2 unit from the point. He looked very good back there and would give us some optionality. I think he’s a guy who AV would enjoy to work into his lineup. Plays a speed/skill game which coincides with the AV system. If things go well, he’d be a prime candidate to be a Pouliot 2.0.
I don’t see him warranting much of a raise, but he’s a UFA so who knows. But 4×4.5 seems about right, so think Zucarello money. If it fits after you address some other problems on our roster, then I’d welcome him. Not someone to target off the jump but a guy who would help some ailments with this group. He would be a nice middle 6 addition who would get some PP time and help the team’s creativity and goal scoring ability.
For ppl who like guys who “know how to win” he’s done that…twice… so there’s a neat headline.
Too much pessimism on this site lately.
I rather think of it as soul searching. After a thumping like they got from the Pens and a lackluster 2nd half of the season, soul searching would seem to be in order.
I just think we need wait and see how this summer plays out before we catch fades about next season.
Well there was a ton of pollyannish optimism before the playoffs brought people back to reality.
“Well, New York is poised to take its first step in the right direction in the coming days when the Blueshirts sign Russian prospect Pavel Buchnevich to his Entry-Level contract.”
What’s the news on Buch?
Very close according to Igor Eronko https://twitter.com/IgorEronko/status/729746691491008512
Another thing we lack is shot first d men. An area LA, tb, pit all outclassed us in in playoffs. But sure hand yandle 75b until hea 50 bc you like his beard.
I hate his beard.
Needing a shoot first D-man and needing Yandle are not mutually exclusive concepts.
Yezzir!
What’s a ‘shot first D’? Is that the kind of D that’s really good at getting his shot blocked so the other team can have odd man rushes on the regular?
The last thing you want is some animal that just wants to let it fly from the blue line. The Rangers have actual skill players on their team, they don’t need to rely on caveman offense.
Like Webber or Chara or Mcginnes? Those kind of useless cavemen?
Look at Nashville and Boston, they don’t field the most interesting (or effective) attacks.
Up until this season, the Rangers were all about the transition game. That’s what the Rangers forwards are built to do. They need Ds, like Yandle, that are interested in pushing the pace and can breakout out quickly.
Trading Nash to a team like Buffallo is the best option. They have tons of cap room, are looking to make the playoffs and could spare to part with some of thier depth thanks to the arrivals of Reinhart and Eichel. Give them Nash and take back two players…
Tyler Ennis fits just what the Rangers need. A young, fast, versatile forward who can play on the wing or center.
Then have Nash smoke us four times a year, no thanks.
Trade based on best partner/return. If you go the Hagelin route and limit yourself to west coast teams, they’ll just trade him to Pittsburgh in the middle of the year.
Control what you can, which is our roster for next yr. Let the other chips fall as they may.
Nash has a full No Trade Clause. I highly doubt he waives that go to Buffalo. These things have to be taken into consideration.
He has a partial no trade
True, but I highly doubt Buffalo is a city Nash would put on his list of acceptable destinations.
Yep. Highly doubtful Nash would want to be exiled to Buffalo, though that might be the best fit for him.
I think he would thrive away from the Broadway spotlight, his easy going (lacking intensity) personality would fit better. His work ethic would be very appreciated by the young stars, and he would not be expected to be a superstar, but a star helping their new crop of talent.
Went to school at University of Buffalo for a time back in the 70’s when the Sabres were starting to decline from being a better team, Was a good hockey town back then, but I’m not sure Nash would want to trade Broadway for some hot wings. ?
All the talk is about trading Nash, but for me it’s trading guys like Stepan, Brassard, Klein, Fast, McDonagh, depending on the return. I want to get bigger & meaner at Centre, this is where the real weakness lies.
Clearly, these players, if packaged correctly can bring back a bounty of players that could help us in years to come. Whether they can make us better in the 2016/17 campaign, well that is another story.
Can’t we just use a first round draft pick to obtain a franchise center.
I think we have one in, what 2083?
Nash has a lot of skills, far more than most of their roster. Unless he waives his no trade and unless they can get sure fire talent or an established star for him from a team that can afford most of his contract, it is unlikely that he will be moved.
We had John Moore, and Anthony Duclair, both of whom fill these needs well. Not to mention a first round pick, which was all given up for an overpaid, overrated d-man who doesn’t play a lick of defense.
Duclair on the Rangers would be an ok player. He’s not good enough to get anything more than 3rd line minutes in NY. I don’t know if would have managed 20 goals in NY. Also, he managed to pot almost 20% of his shots. Duclair may be a bit overrated.
Anyway, we have Buch joining, JT Miller, Chris Kreider, Derek Stepan, and Kevin Hayes. How many under 26 scoring forwards do you want in the lineup at once?
John Moore did NOTHING while he was here. His claim to fame was Joe Mich bragging about a rush up the ice in an exhibition game at the Garden! That was his Ranger career. He was so good, Phoenix let him go. Hes found a home in NJ,— until they get better, and dump him too.
But joe, he got into the fightzzzzz,
There’s a reason Moore looked good in NJ, that team is sorely lacking talent. Present day Tom Poti would look in that miserable lineup.
Helm or Chimera would be perfect! Really hoping we land 1 of them!
Nash & a 2018 1st rd pick to StL for Shattenkirk and any number of bodies to make weight. Do not want to hold any of Nash’s salary.
Nash’s NTC is clouded at best, I’m assuming Slats granted it even though he didn’t have to.
Lots of chatter about the inability to trade Staal and or Girardi. If you set your sights low on the return there are teams that would take them. Think Edmonton(gave Andrew Ferrence a big contract then made him Captain and also over paid Pouliet), Phoenix(to meet the floor), Carolina(to mentor Hanafin), Columbus(Torts loves these 2), any team that’s been trying to rebuild and failed miserable at Defense would want the leadership. You may have to retain some salary, which you would do also on a buyout, only for a longer period of time. And you may get something like a 3rd rounder and a low end prospect, but you free up a bunch of space. Never say never. A change of scenery may do wonders for these guys.
We will continue to have mediocre talent and be a team that squeaks into the playoffs and gets shown the door quickly unless we add some youth and speed. We cannot have a top line that plays more like a 3rd line. We can’t have an anemic PP and cannot have a swiss cheese PK. We worry about the 4th line too much and the breakout pass too little. Let’s add some fresh ideas BEHIND the bench so the guys on the ice can do different things. Please!!!!!
Ya a new coach would be welcome. We need a coach with a personality who demonstrates leadership.
Now Paul, let’s not be so harsh, remember he is a first ballot HOF coach!!!!
Oh that is a miss type, HOS, hall of shame, now that’s more like it. He has a load of personality, don’t you see it in his interviews, sucking on the life savers, looking for new concepts, and doing the same old, same old………..
I shouldn’t be so harsh now should I???????
Even if I don’t agree with it, AV is gonna be the HC until the annual December swoon, then we are screwed for the season unless Ulf or Arniel really step up.
I really wish Slats would step down and stick to golf so I can have a better idea who I can piss and moan about.
yeah, but AV is such an easy mark, and fun to poke holes at !!!!!!!
what else would we be talking about, you see, now we can LOL………
after so many years, why do I take all this garbage so personal, I guess I’m just a fan?????????
I grew up rooting for the Brooklyn Dodgers, so this isn’t too foreign to me…