flagyl 100

Would the Rangers and Jason Spezza make sense?

Would acquiring Spezza make the Rangers stronger?

Would acquiring Spezza make the Rangers stronger?

The Rangers need an elite playmaking center, Jason Spezza wants out of Ottawa and the Senators General manager, Bryan Murray has already publicly admitted he won’t get full value for his star center. There are countless reasons why Jason Spezza makes sense for the Rangers, not least because of positional need. Of course, with the Ducks, Blues and other Western Conference teams heavily rumoured to be looking at Spezza, the Rangers may not even be in the picture. This much we do know; the Rangers have a need, Spezza has ten teams he won’t go to and that list doesn’t include the Rangers.

The Rangers had their opportunities against the Kings in the Cup Finals. They didn’t make it a closer series in part because they did not convert enough on the powerplay and because the Kings were the better team down the middle. Spezza helps address both issues. He has been a powerplay force, he is an elite playmaking centre and he is strong in the face off circles.

Perhaps most crucially is the fact that Spezza doesn’t come with a significant contractual commitment. With only one year on his remaining deal the Rangers wouldn’t need to commit to Spezza before seeing whether he can perform on the New York stage and given the acknowledgement by Murray he will likely get less than equal value there’s a chance for the Rangers to steal an elite player who fills a need.

The Calgary Flames (a club who made Spezza’s list of teams who he won’t consider) have been rumoured to be interested and are thought to be offering Jiri Hudler, Mikael Backlund or Dennis Wideman and one of their several second and third round draft picks. All talented players but that is a package the Rangers could afford to match, even as their prospect pool isn’t as deep due to recent graduations.

The biggest questions relevant to the Rangers are how much do the Rangers decision makers feel the club are in a win-now mode and whether they’re willing to part with a roster player and a pick. If the decision is Spezza can put them over the top, there are enough assets within the organisation to make a deal. Spezza in New York slides Derek Stepan and Derick Brassard into more appropriate positions on the second and third lines and gives the Rangers legitimate depth and strength down the middle.

So what are the dangers with taking Spezza? Is Spezza just a younger version of Brad Richards and could he decline in the same manner Richards has? Is Spezza too injury prone? Is just one guaranteed year of Spezza (expiring contract considered) worth giving away yet more assets? There are plenty of question marks surrounding Spezza and whether he’s worth it but the Rangers need an elite center to compete with the likes of the Kings and Spezza represents a lot less long term risk than chasing a talented but risky free agent such as Paul Statsny.

If you give Spezza an elite winger such as Nash then Spezza, health allowing, is still an 80 – 100 point player in the regular season; he just hasn’t had that kind of support regularly enough in Ottawa. Now, with Brad Richards officially an Ex – Ranger attention will turn to the Rangers need to fill their center position once again.

The last time the Rangers had an 80 point center was when the surprising and yet underrated Michael Nylander rode shotgun with Jaromir Jagr way back in 2006-07. In that same time frame Jason Spezza has broken 80 points three times and also had 66+ on two more occasions. He’s the type of player New York needs. Spezza makes sense for so many reasons so it will be interesting to see how Glen Sather and co. tend to a major organisational need.

6 Responses to “Would the Rangers and Jason Spezza make sense?”

  1. Gary says:

    Nice write up Chris. It is obvious the Rangers are in win now mode with Hank still on top of his game and the team dealing away 1st rounders every time you turn around.

    So Spezza? I say yes, and #1 center is THE thing this team needs. That prime time guy who can occupy a lot of opposition attention for Nash and obviously would-be #2 Step and #3 Brass.

    I am usually a build from within guy, but that ship came in under Torts and it has sailed away now. The strong need to get stronger because Montreal, Philly, Boston, Pittsburgh, etc. are all going to do what they can to get stronger.

    I like that Spezza brings the offense and I like that he’s got size. Add him plus JT Miller and Oscar Lindberg and you’ve got a great combination of size, speed and youth on the team. Of course if acquiring Spezza means trading both or even one of those guys that could be a problem.

    It might come down to having to sell on Brassard with his stock high, and add a Lindberg or Miller and I don’t think I’d be interested.

    So I guess I am all for Spezza if Sather can steal him as Chris mentioned.

  2. paulronty says:

    My son-in-law, who lives in Ottawa, would be delighted if Spezza was traded to the Rangers because he’s soft as Merda frankly. He couldn’t take the criticism in Ottawa, so how do you think that translates to NY? And giving away the farm to get guys like this will only come back to bite us in the end. No to Spezza because he doesn’t’always play with the intensity required to win the Cup.

  3. AD says:

    Any player such as Spezza, who is highly coveted by a handful of quality teams and who is willing to play for many teams, is simply unattainable for the Rangers. Realistically, we don’t have the assets to compete with other offers. We don’t have ample draft picks and it isn’t realistic to think we would trade Kreider. Now, Staal and Stepan may be tradeable assets but that is questionable, and it is questionable whether the team would improve if those players were dealt.

    Practically, when all things are considered, Paul Statsny is the solution for the Rangers. It makes more sense to even overpay for Statsny then to trade away key assets for Spezza, Thornton or similar players. At least, that is how I see things.

    I do think both Spezza and Statsny are players Sather has had serious interest in for several years.

  4. rangermom says:

    Interesting, yes. Fills a need, yes. But, who would you give up (that would make the Sens bite)?

  5. Brian says:

    No. No, no, NO!!!! Just another overpaid and underachieving star player that’ll be getting boo’d off the ice by mid-December. Not interested. Bring in Mikhail Grabovski. He’ll be cheaper, fits AV’s system better (advanced stats point to that), and will, in all honesty, probably produce just as much as Spezza would anyway.

  6. Dave says:

    I’d assume the cost is too high, both in cap (unless Ottawa takes some salary) and in player cost.