Rangers midseason grades: The defenseDecember 31, 2013, by
Suit kicked off our annual midseason grades yesterday with his review of Alain Vigneault and the coaching staff. As Suit mentioned in his preamble, we all hand out ‘performance grades’ around the mid-way point of the regular season and just after the commencement of the playoffs. As always, these grades aren’t just based on stats, but also the execution of each personnel or player’s respective role within the organization.
We do not take these grades lightly. Each grade is very well thought out. For the defense, I graded based on two areas: on-ice performance based on role on team, stats (both traditional and #fancy) based on role. It’s important to note that I stressed role on the team. This means that a player like Dan Girardi will be graded based on his role as a shutdown performer, and Michael Del Zotto on his offensive contributions.
A quick note about the numbers being used: Goals-Assists-Points, Corsi, OZone starts, Quality of Competition faced. Details here.
Ryan McDonagh (6-17-23, 51.3% Corsi, 47.4% OZ starts, 29.6% ToTm QoC)
What more is there to say about Ryan McDonagh? The kid has solidified himself not only as the team’s top defenseman, but a Norris trophy candidate. His 23 points lead the defensemen, and he does this while facing the toughest matchups on the team (tied with Girardi) and starting the second-fewest shifts in the offensive zone (Girardi – 46.9%). He has also emerged as the top powerplay producer (1-7-8 with the man advantage) for a team struggling to get contributions from the point.
Dan Girardi (2-7-9, 50.0% Corsi, 46.9% OZ starts, 29.6% ToTm QoC)
Girardi has struggled this season, even if his stats don’t necessarily show his struggles. On paper Girardi is a solid defensive defenseman, getting the tough assignments and still managing to stay at the 50% puck possession line. On paper, it’s what you would want. But on the ice, we’ve seen something very different in the way Girardi has been playing. There are a lot of scoring chances given up because Girardi has been out of position, forcing himself to snow angel instead of cutting down the angle appropriately. That is what separates him from McDonagh (aside from scoring), his foot speed and skating is getting exploited in a new, non-shot blocking based defensive zone system. It’s not to say that Girardi is having a poor season, he’s just not having the season we have expected of our top shutdown guy.
Marc Staal (2-1-3, 53.5% Corsi, 46.5% OZ starts, 28.7% ToTm QoC)
Staal is a tough one to grade. Although not relied upon to score, just 3 points in 30 games is a sharp decline in offensive production. Pre-2012 concussion, Staal was a borderline 30 point player, and was on pace for 40 points last season (prorated). That said, Staal has been one of the more steady defensemen for the Rangers when he plays. No longer relied upon to do the heavy lifting as a top pairing defenseman, Staal has been a solid second pairing guy. He is second among defenseman in puck possession (Anton Stralman leads the team) while still facing some very difficult competition. He’s prone to some major gaffes, but no defenseman is perfect. I just wish he would stay healthy.
Grade: B when healthy
Anton Stralman (0-4-4, 55.8% Corsi, 52.2% OZ starts, 28.5% ToTm QoC)
There has been no bigger surprise than Anton Stralman. Initially expected to be a bottom pairing guy, Stralman’s strong early season play —21 straight games as a positive relative Corsi— catapulted him to the second pairing with Staal. Although it isn’t showing up on the scoreboard (he’s not relied upon for scoring), his Corsi of 55.8% leads all Ranger defensemen. He is getting favorable zone starts, but he’s also facing pretty stiff competition, a by-product of moving up to the second pairing. Not without fault, Stralman’s play trailed off significantly in December before his wrist injury, with 11 of his last 18 games as a negative Corsi. His recent stretch of mediocre play has been very visible on the ice, as he has fallen victim to over using the snow angel as well.
Michael Del Zotto (2-5-7, 51.2% Corsi, 61.4% OZ starts, 27.9% ToTm QoC)
Although not as bad as everyone has made him out to be (far better than Justin Falk, on par with John Moore), Del Zotto has certainly struggled this year. He is second among defensemen in offensive zone starts (John Moore – 66.6%) but just fourth in Corsi. Relied upon to provide stability to the powerplay and generate offense while playing second pairing minutes, MDZ is third among defensemen in scoring. All of this has led to Del Zotto sitting in the press box for multiple games and non-stop trade rumors. His defensive zone play isn’t perfect by any stretch, but he isn’t the major liability that everyone assumes just by looking at his number.
John Moore (2-5-7, 50.9% Corsi, 66.6% OZ starts, 27.4% ToTm QoC)
These numbers look familiar, don’t they? Perhaps the difference between Moore and Del Zotto is that MDZ was supposed to provide offensive stability and top-four minutes, while Moore was a relative unknown?
Anyway, Moore has tremendous talent and potential, but has yet to harness all of it. His numbers show he is still struggling with the offensive part of his game, and his play on the ice shows that he has been struggling in the defensive zone as well.
Grade: C, because less was expected of Moore, despite the similar numbers.
Justin Falk (0-2-2, 44.4% Corsi, 58.9% OZ starts, 27.0% ToTm QoC)
On paper, Falk’s numbers are rough. On the ice, his positioning and skating have been exploited numerous times. Simply put, both Moore and Del Zotto are better choices than Falk, who was slated as the 7th defenseman anyway. Falk does bring a physical edge to the game, and is certainly a better skater than Stu Bickel. As a #7, Falk is serviceable. Problem is that he’s being relied upon too much because of injuries and inconsistent play by Moore and Del Zotto.
Grade C, based on his role
Dylan McIlrath and Connor Allen receive incompletes, as they haven’t played enough games.