buy discount cialis

The importance of a two game lead

Here’s an interesting statistic for you: The Rangers are unbeaten in Games 1, 3, and 7 this postseason. They are a perfect 8-0 in those games. Another interesting stat: The Rangers haven’t won in Games 2 or 4 this postseason. They are a combined 0-6 0-5 (that’s an awful typo) in those games. Scary, right? In fact, the Rangers have never built a two game lead during these playoffs.

The Blueshirts have a prime opportunity on Monday to take a two game lead against the Devils. With their 3-0 victory over the Devils yesterday, a win in which Henrik Lundqvist stole the show, the Rangers have now shut out the Devils by that margin twice in three games. Sure, the Devils may have dominated the game yesterday, but it was the Rangers who came out with the series lead, and the Rangers with an opportunity to make it a two game lead headed back to MSG.

Why is a two game lead so important? Well, it takes the pressure off the team to constantly as if one bad bounce could end their season. And to be frank, the Rangers have had several games where a bad bounce almost ended their season. A two game lead essentially eliminates the luck factor from the equation, as the Devils would have to win three games in a row to end the series.

But the Rangers have failed to capitalize on victories in Game 1 in each of their first three series, and have failed to capitalize on two previous Game 3 victories.

The rest factor is another big factor in all this. Should the Rangers have another series go to seven games, then the Kings –who look to be on the verge of sweeping the Coyotes– will have another week and a half off before the Stanley Cup Finals begins.

For a Rangers team that would have played the maximum 21 games at that point, the rest is a big deal. They would essentially eliminate that advantage from LA.

It all starts with a victory in Game 4 tomorrow night. They can’t afford to come out the way they did in the first two periods yesterday. The Devils are too good a team to let chances like that just disappear. Plus it would be nice, as a fan, to not have to sit on the edge of my seat every game . A little less stress would be nice. So please, a two game lead?

8 Responses to “The importance of a two game lead”

  1. Steven T says:

    Isn’t it a combined 0-5 in Games 2 and 4? Other than that, really solid point, Rangers need to get a big game 4 win to actually get some rest while not once again going the max amount of games and giving fans heart attacks

  2. Matt says:

    I don’t want to sound greedy here, but dam….knowing they had a lead in game 2 and couldn’t hold it sucks.

    It’s with a grain of salt though, because they were outplayed in the last 2.

  3. RobC610 says:

    Unfortunately I think the trend will continue. I just don’t see the rangers stealing another one in NJ. The have not made it easy on themselves all year, why would they start now. They better come out quicker and more determined in game 4 if they want to have a chance but I just dont see it. This series is going 7 just like the last 2 and that doesn’t bode well in the finals against the kings who should be well rested.

  4. roadrider says:

    I want that two-game lead too but even that won’t guarantee a short finish. This Ranger team seems to thrive on being on the edge. It’s a dangerous game to play and I think the physical toll of their style of play will eventually catch up to them but it’s worked for them so far.

    As stressful as it is to watch, I’ll take the wins any way they can get them and worry about LA and how much rest they have is and when things get to that point (although I wouldn’t be unhappy if Phoenix stages a big comeback).

  5. Mikeyyy says:

    Who cares if they play all 7. It’s just pain.