buy discount cialis

Vezina comparison: Quick vs. Lundqvist

The race for the Vezina trophy may come down to three finalists, but this year it’s a two horse race between Henrik Lundqvist and Jonathan Quick. To be fair, both are very deserving of the award. They have had tremendous years, and are clearly the two best goalies this year. While we have been spoiled by having the best goalie in the world in net, the Kings would not be anywhere even close to the playoffs without Quick. Even looking at the stats, there’s no clear cut winner between the two of them:

Lundqvist: 39-17-5, 1.93 GAA, .931 SV%, 8 SO
Quick: 35-21-12, 1.93 GAA, .929 SV%, 10 SO

Before Quick gave up five goals to the Sharks, Quick’s numbers may have made him the front runner for the award. However, that five goal game gave Lundqvist the superior numbers heading into the season’s final game. The award is not just based on numbers though. Both goalies have a case for and case against that will be thought about by the GMs before a decision is made.

The case for Lundqvist

Lundqvist is the single most important player on the best team in the Eastern Conference, and possibly the NHL. The Rangers have had significant injuries to two of their top four defensemen, and have used a whopping 11 players on the blue line throughout the season. All that in a division that has four teams with 100 points, and four of the top six seeds in the Eastern Conference. If the division winners weren’t given the top three seeds, than the division would have four of the top five seeds. Against those opponents in the Atlantic, Lundqvist is 14-5-0 with a 1.84 GAA and a .936 SV%. Lundqvist is the best goalie in the league playing in the toughest division in the NHL.

The case against Lundqvist

Despite the injuries to the top four defense, the Rangers still boast one of the top defensive teams in the league. They are 2nd in blocked shots with 1,321 and 3rd in goals against (183, of course LA is ahead of them in goals against with 176). The Rangers are also the more balanced team who is in the upper half of the league in scoring (11th – 225). To put this in perspective, the Kings are 29th in blocked shots and goals for. Also, Lundqvist’s roughest month happens to be the most recent month, while Quick’s was much earlier in the season.

The case for Quick

Quick leads the league in shutouts, but that isn’t a determining factor since Lundqvist didn’t win last year despite leading the league in shutouts. Quick also doesn’t have the benefit of any offensive support. As mentioned above, Quick received just 192 goals, which is good for 29th in the league. Until he gave up five goals to the Sharks, he also had the better stats. Quick has played an equal role in getting his team to the playoffs, and had to deal with his coach getting fired halfway through the season.

The case against Quick

The Pacific Division is not as strong as the Atlantic. None of the five teams will crack 100 points, and none of them have a goal differential better than +17. Quick may have more shutouts, but he is only 9-8-1 against the same quality of opponents the Rangers have faced (the top five offensive teams in the conference).

There’s no “bad” choice for the Vezina this season. Ranger fans will be outraged if Quick wins, and Kings fans will be outraged if Lundqvist wins. At the risk of sounding like a homer, that five goal game put Lundqvist back on top for the voting. Quick is a fine goalie, but Lundqvist has been the better goalie in a much tougher division.

7 Responses to “Vezina comparison: Quick vs. Lundqvist”

  1. Walt says:

    Any fair minded person, looking at where the Rangers would be without Hank, would have to say Hank, your the man!!!!!

    Lundqvist has carried this team on his shoulders for his entire career, and now there is no reason in the world, unless they stack the deck against Hank, that he doesn’t win the Vezina this year. Look at the east, in our division, there are four other teams, besides us, with over 100 points. The west is no where near as tough, and as good a season as Quick has had, he can’t even carry Hank’s jock strap.

  2. Matt J says:

    The best case for Lundqvist is if they nominate someone else from the western conference like Pekka Rinne to split the votes out west. East coast bias also plays a role so I’m hoping this helps out Lundqvist.

    If it’s really close I don’t know how they couldn’t give it to Lundqvist. He’s got tenure which really helps too. Quick is sort of the new kid on the block compared to Lundqvist. Not to mention Hank has been nominated already.

  3. Chris says:

    Lundqvist deserves it. He’s an MVP candidate, I’m not sure Quick is in the final discussions for the Hart. Although that’s Malkin’s to lose.

    Will be interesting to see the award announced.

  4. The Suit says:

    Lundqvist for Vezina or we riot.

    • Justin says:

      I was going to lay out my rational view of why I feel Hank should win, but I’m just gonna follow the Suit’s lead on this one…

  5. rob sahm says:

    if hank doesent win it this year he never will