best hairstyles for women with thinning hair

Grachev To The Wolf Pack The Right Thing To Do.

There are a few differences between the situations of Derek Stepan and Evgeny Grachev. The Rangers did the right thing when they sent down Grachev yesterday because despite showing willing he wasn’t ready for NHL play. So what are the differences between the two players’ situations? Firstly Stepan has shown he can contribute offensively and Grachev hasn’t. 3 shots in 6 games is not enough even though his ice time hampered his chance to show his offensive game (as did his line mates). On the other hand Stepan showed he can contribute with an array of line mates and has shown that even when not putting up numbers he can play responsibly. Can the same be said for the Russian? Not quite. Then there is the not so small fact that Grachev is still acclimatising to other aspects of North American life including the language and the style of play. It’s easy to forget that this is still only his third year in North America so allowing him to adapt in an environment such as Hartford where the expectancy and spotlight is much less is the safer, responsible thing to do. Many prospects have wilted under the bright lights of NYC before.

Then there’s the harsh but true fact that Grachev didn’t really deserve a call up in the first place. He was inconsistent in Hartford last year and he hadn’t exactly lit up the AHL this time around either. On the other hand, Derek Stepan had an excellent year in the NCAA for Wisconsin and followed that up with an impressive camp. In short, Stepan’s play demanded that he stick around. Grachev is not a bust by any means. Some people will see his play (since leaving Brampton of the OHL) as a regression but consider all the factors that he is dealing with and the fact power forward types take longer to develop anyway. Also don’t forget that the Rangers don’t need to rush him. The fact he got a few games to see what the NHL was all about is almost a bonus and hopefully will have whet his appetite for more. It may be a different position to Grachev but take a look at Zdeno Chara’s start in North America. He was a European with a huge frame whose first 147 NHL games yielded just 29 points as well as a horrendous – 61 plus/minus. Chara was lucky his development time was spent at the Islanders who could afford to have a liability on the roster (pity for them they didn’t show a little more patience…..). Grachev deserves to be sent down but it’s not a bad thing, it’s the right thing. No need to panic just yet.

3 Responses to “Grachev To The Wolf Pack The Right Thing To Do.”

  1. Bobby Ess says:

    I think the Rangers finally are getting things right. I saw this kid (briefly) play, and although, at times, he looked a bit lost, I did see a player that will grow in the NHL with some patience shown. I’m still sick from losing Rick (Middleton) for some over-the-hill Bruins.

  2. Section 121 says:

    Hey Torts! Play the offensive guys with the other offensive guys. i.e. when Grachev comes up, don’t have him slumming around with the likes of Boogie. Likewise, Frolov and Stepan should be playing first or second line with the likes of EC or White (this would be Prospal or Drury when healthy). Boyle, Prust, Avery, Feds are all third or fourth line players; sure they play hard and hustle but that’s what they’re supposed to do.

    The mixing of lines; offensive ability with grit is driving me crazy as well as the quick trigger finger to demote and change the lines.

    The best thing for Stepan long term may be to keep him as far away from Torts as possible.

    One comment about Avery; he’s off to a great start and playing really well down low. Nevertheless, he’s still a 3rd liner, energy, agitator.

  3. Section 121 says:

    Oh yeah, one other thing, Redden is clearly the fifth best defenseman in the system. The best players did not make this team and we suffer for it defensively because of cap considerations due to contract errors made by Sather.

    Also, I don’t understand why Torts likes Eminger so much. Can anyone explain this?