Weise vs. Prust vs. Byers

The Rangers, as they approach the 2010 offseason, will have a few difficult choices to make. One of those choices includes the curious case of Dale Weise, Brandon Prust, and Dane Byers. Each player brings a similar game to the table, but only one has seen significant NHL time to prove he belongs. With third/fourth line players Brian Boyle, Aaron Voros, and Donald Brashear already under contract for next season, and Chris Drury very quickly becoming a role player, the Rangers are looking at a few extra forwards. Unfortunately, none of these forwards belong on a team’s top-six. It appears there are only two spots available on these two lines. Those two spots are going to go to two of Weise, Prust and Byers. (For arguments sake, let’s assume that if Brashear isn’t back, that Jody Shelley will be, leaving the same number of open spots.)

Starting with Dale Weise, the only player of the trio under contract for next season, has never played an NHL game in his career. Still on his entry level contract at a $700k cap hit, Weise was called up briefly at the end of last season, only to sit in the press box watching the Rangers miss the playoffs. The 2008 fourth round pick put up 50 points (28-22) in 73 games with Hartford this past season, adding 114 PIMs to his point total. He is a prototypical power forward in the AHL. Those who watch him on a daily basis say that the winger is ready for the NHL. He may not put up 28 goals, but he would be able to skate with the pros and hold his own as a grinder. Weise, to the Rangers, represents a cheap, somewhat versatile bottom-six forward who may or may not succeed at the NHL level. What Weise has working for him is the fact that he is signed, a RW (which the Rangers severely lack), and that coach John Tortorella is on the record saying he wishes he could have found a spot for him to play. What he does not have going for him is that he does not have to pass through waivers, and he is unproven at the NHL level.

Next on this list is Brandon Prust, the only player of the trio to find success at the NHL level. Prust, an RFA who was a cap hit of $500k last season, was acquired by the Rangers in the Olli Jokinen trade. In the 26 games he played with the Rangers, Prust was a pleasant surprise, netting 4 goals, 5 assists, and 65 PIMs after the trade. What Prust represents to the Rangers is a young, gritty winger who is not afraid to drop the gloves with anyone in the NHL. Prust serves a purpose on any teams 4th line, as he has proven he can skate and chip in a few goals here and there. Prust is also a very cheap option for the Rangers to put on a bottom-six forward line. However, Prust is due a raise from his $500k salary. With the Rangers in dire salary cap straits, Prust may find himself being a cap casualty, even at a minimal raise. As long as Prust does not ask for more than Weise, he should find himself in Ranger blue next season.

The last on this list is the curious case of Dane Byers. Byers, an RFA this season who was a cap hit of $500k last season, was drafted by the Rangers in the 2nd round of the 2004 draft. Prust has played just 6 NHL games, netting 1 goal and 31 PIMs (all 31 coming from his 5 games this season). Although he was drafted in the 2nd round, Byers has failed to crack the NHL roster in each of the past three seasons. This past season in Hartford, Byers put together a respectable line of 26-26-51, with 100 PIMs in 76 games. The 24 year old winger may actually find himself at the bottom of the depth chart amongst this trio. Byers would also come cheap, and would probably be the cheapest of the trio, which works to his advantage. Much like Weise, Byers is still unproven at the NHL level, but represents a bottom-six forward with size and some goal scoring ability. Unfortunately for Byers, Weise may have passed him on the depth chart this past season.

All signs point to Dale Weise being put in the position of having a roster spot for him to lose come training camp. He has the coach on his side, and has the distinct advantage of actually being signed heading into next season. Prust, being the only player of the trio with successful NHL experience, has history on his side (a strong finish to last season doesn’t hurt either). If he comes relatively cheap, it is a fair assumption that he will be back in blue next season. If you had to create a depth chart from these three guys, it would generally be Weise-Prust-Byers, or Prust-Weise-Byers. The common theme here is that, unfortunately, Dane Byers could find himself as the odd man out. With the glut of bottom-six forwards signed, the Rangers are going to have to make a tough decision when it comes to these three forwards. It is possible that all three are re-signed, but chances are slim that all three will find themselves as a member of the Rangers come opening night in October.

6 Responses to “Weise vs. Prust vs. Byers”

  1. Brian says:

    Prust has earned a spot on the 4th line (at least)- he has shown to be a versatile, hard-working, team first guy (kinda reminds me of a young Troy Mallette). He is also insurance in case we don’t resign Shelley.

    As far as Byers and Weise are concerned we should let them fight for a spot in training camp (this would also mean to avoid signing/trading for a player that would conceiveably take or compete for their roster spot). I would prefer a lineup that features a 4th line that can contribute because i thought we were a much better team late in the year when Torts used more of his bench.

    • Dave says:

      I would prefer they trade Voros and let Weise and Byers have the spots, but that’s just my two cents.

      • Brian says:

        Agreed, If Voros is untradeable then send him down and call him up as needed if injuries hit (if he gets picked up on waivers then fine).

        • Dave says:

          I have nothing against Voros, but that $1 million cap hit is rough. He is a good spare forward on a team with too many spare forwards.

  2. Terry says:

    Wow I forget that Byers has been around so long…career AHL-er? I defintely want to see Prust back. I haven’t been able to see Weise play much. Do you think Brian Boyle will remain with the team? Looks like his cap hit is $525k but I’d rather see a hungry kid like Weise take his spot…especially if Weise can put a few in the net.

  3. Fotiu is God says:

    Brandon Prust’s strong play down the stretch not only should earn him a regular slot in ’10-11, but cement Olli Chokinen as the throw-in component in last year’s swap with Calgary.

    Moreover, give Dane Byers, Brodie Dupont (who’s been described as having the stuff of a future Rangers’ captain) and Dale Weise the shot at training camp. They should all get long looks (re ice team) from January on, as well.

    Had Detroit given Justin Abdelkader and their A-team prospects more of than a passing look from mid-season on, it’s likely the older Wings’ forwards wouldn’t have been completely gassed come May.

    Torts and Slats: pay heed. The kids are al-right.