flagyl 100

Finding Kotalik Ice Time

It’s becoming increasingly clear that Ales Kotalik will be an important member of the 2009-10 New York Rangers. Not only does he have a booming shot on the power play, he’s shown strong defensive responsibilities, and a nose for the net. So far, he has 3 goals and 2 assists,  and he’s done that while spending two games on the fourth line. Which brings me to my next question: How do the Rangers find ice time for Kotalik?

The first two lines are set in stone: Prospal-Dubinsky-Gaborik, and Higgins-Drury-Callahan. Both have created plenty of scoring chances, and have been the top two lines on the ice in most games. The third and fourth line is where things start to get tricky. When Sean Avery returned, he was placed on the third line, with Artem Anisimov and Enver Lisin. Kotalik was moved to the fourth line, and Aaron Voros was moved to the bench. The problem is, Kotalik is not a fourth liner. Hell, for 3 million a year, he’s probably not a 3rd liner either. The Rangers, I believe, have to find Kotalik more time. But, how do they do it?

The easiest scenario is moving Enver Lisin to the fourth line. His speed would be a welcome addition. And although Dave thinks otherwise, I think Lisin has been very impressive in the offensive zone thus far. Defensively, he’s a work in progress, which is why I think a fourth line assignment wouldn’t be good for him. Lisin needs to be with other offensively talented guys to succeed. Playing with Boyle and Brashear is probably not the answer.

You could also bench Lisin, and bring back Aaron Voros. A line of Brashear-Boyle-Voros is intriguing, and they played well the first couple of games together. But by benching Lisin, you risk stunting his development. If you send him down to Hartford to play regularly, you risk the chance of him bolting for the KHL. It’s a no-win situation.

The final scenario is putting Avery on the fourth line. His goal scoring would be a nice addition to the hard working fourth line, and something about Brashear and Avery on the ice at the same time gets me excited. But, Avery is not a fourth line player. He’s a legitimate top 6 forward.

This is a good problem to have. I can’t remember the last time the Rangers had too many guys who could provide offense. I’m not sure what the coaching staff will do. There are a lot of variables, but I can’t see Kotalik staying on the fourth line all year. You could switch Lisin and Kotalik depending on matchups. That might be the way to go, but then you risk chemistry. It’s a tough call, but one I’m glad the Rangers have. So what do you think? How can the Rangers best find Kotalik ice time?

4 Responses to “Finding Kotalik Ice Time”

  1. jurgenno88 says:

    Hey Jeremy,

    I agree its a great problem to have. I also think Dave has to admit he’s been better than expected thus far! (although it is 6 games). I think its going to come down to him being an expensive special teams player but so long as the PP continues to click it’s an acceptable evil.
    I really like the line of Avery – Anisimov – Kotalik. It gives AA 2 guys to learn from and Avery will provide grit and make space for AA to make plays. I really like our depth right now.

    I agree that Lisin is not ideal for the 4th but its got to be the best for the team in the first instance and thats a line of Avery – AA – Kotalik.

  2. Dave says:

    Kotalik has been better than advertised so far. But it’s only been 6 games. Let’s see how he does for three years.

  3. jurgenno88 says:

    Dave, i agree its not wise to read too much in to 6 games but lets appreciate the good start and if we get 1 good year out of him at least that makes him a tradeable asset (assuming NTC got waived)…
    i dont think we can say lets see how the 3 years pan out but rather have to think year to year. Personally if we get a 20-25+25 year and solid play throughout then i’ll be happy.

    I think because of his cannon we might score goals on the PP that he may not get credit for.